DeathSpank is not...
Jul 29, 2008 ten to seven pm
Despite what 1UP said, DeathSpank is NOT a superhero. I hate superheroes. I'm one of only 5 people on the planet brave enough to admit the new Batman movie was a big pile of poo. Come on people. Think about it. There was only one superhero movie worth more than the vomit of plastic it was printed on and it was pure genius: Unbreakable.
To recap:
- DeathSpank: Not a superhero.
- Batman: Big pile of poo.
- Unbreakable: Pure genius.
You are all now better people.
Hey! Pay attention! Except where otherwise noted, this site is
licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Other people's comments:
Posted by Ruzom on Jul 29, 2008 seven pm
Posted by Ron Gilbert on Jul 29, 2008 five past seven pm
Posted by Zripwud on Jul 29, 2008 twenty past seven pm
Posted by The_Raven on Jul 29, 2008 half past seven pm
Posted by Robert 'Groby' Blum on Jul 29, 2008 twenty five to eight pm
Unbreakable was a pretty large pile of crap. A one-trick director, and a one-trick camera guy, combined with a story told so transparently that you'd know what's coming withing 15 minutes?
The only worthy superhero movie is clearly "Batman & Robin" ;)
Posted by DAGO on Jul 29, 2008 twenty to eight pm
Posted by JSW on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to eleven pm
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 11, 2008 quarter past seven pm
Posted by raydancer on Jul 29, 2008 eight pm
Posted by Nando on Jul 29, 2008 ten past eight pm
Hey, I also think Unbreakable was pure genius!
Posted by MarioColbert on Jul 29, 2008 twenty five to nine pm
Well, I guess we do now. :)
Also, from HotHead Games website:
"Players will follow the thong-tastic adventures of a misguided hero named DeathSpank, a character that first appeared on Gilbert's Grumpy Gamer web site in a series of animated comics."
Posted by Ron Gilbert on Jul 29, 2008 twenty to nine pm
And yes, I don't review movies because I am not a tool of the movie industry and can think for myself.
Posted by Nacho on Jul 29, 2008 five past ten pm
Posted by MarioColbert on Jul 31, 2008 twenty past five pm
I'm super, though. And a hero. (Mostly because I recognize that opinions are irrelevant unless you own the website which hosts such, as such is the power of the last word, and its mighty mighty might.)
Posted by Aridi on Jul 29, 2008 ten to nine pm
Posted by Sqorgar on Jul 29, 2008 twenty five to ten pm
Posted by Graham J on Aug 14, 2008 eight pm
Posted by Lightwalker on Oct 1, 2008 twenty five past five pm
Saying a peanut is a pea is like saying a car is a motorbike, it's not, it's just that they're both forms of transportation.
I'll take my pedant of the year award now thank you! :oP
Posted by Lenny on Jul 29, 2008 twenty to ten pm
Posted by eli on Jul 29, 2008 quarter to eleven pm
Posted by David Thomsen on Jul 30, 2008 twenty five past seven am
Incidentally, why does everyone think having aliens is such a great departure from previous Indy films? It's not like there's any more suspension of disbelief required to believe in aliens than to believe in holy relics.
Posted by Barf on Jul 30, 2008 five past nine am
Posted by foobar on Jul 30, 2008 quarter to one pm
I felt it was to Batman, what Casino Royale was to 007. Don't invent something new, and put an old name on it for the sake of marketability. Batman is about cheesy costumes, carefully labeled equipment and the Batmobile. 007 is about witty remarks, unrealistic situations and Q. If you think it's been done to death, create something new, don't try to "fix" it by taking it seriously.
What were we talking about? Oh right, superheroes... they suck...
Posted by Lightwalker on Oct 1, 2008 half past five pm
Doesn't mean I have to believe in aliens too, just in the power of god.
By the way I'm not bible bashing I'm just pointing out that to many these ideas are mutually exclusive. Believing in God doesn't mean you have to believe in every theory going.
I'm also not saying I don't believe in aliens I'm just saying you can totally believe in one and not the other.
Also regardless of them having magic powers I believe the ark of of the covenant to still be on this earth somewhere. I don't see that massive alien temples exist on earth when we have no evidence of alien contact. We at least have evidence that a man called Jesus existed and was crucified etc.
Posted by D on Jul 29, 2008 twenty five past eleven pm
Dark Knight is basically a police thriller slash drama story which could also function if you take away all those costumes and masks and gadgets. There is nothing comic book related in the movie and even less Batman stuff. Although story is complex and deals with moral and ethical degradation, I just couldn't feel it or care for it. All in all, boring movie, way overhyped.
As for superhero genre ... well, obviously Ron hasn't read Watchmen. :)
Posted by Jimmy_D on Jul 30, 2008 five to one am
Posted by Dick tracy on Jul 30, 2008 five past eleven am
Posted by Lightwalker on Oct 1, 2008 twenty five to six pm
Also what would be the climax? Harvey dent turned into a psycopathic coin flipping mutant with two faces, like that happens all the time in realistic gritty cop dramas right?
Posted by Lightwalker on Oct 1, 2008 twenty five to six pm
I should have said that were batman a cop then cops DO have to reveal their identity, not run around in masks.
I also should have capitalised the first letters on peoples name and the beginning of a couple of sentences...sue me :oP
Posted by DarkArmada on Jul 29, 2008 twenty five past eleven pm
So he's not a Superhero but he is a hero, how about "Quazi-Superhero"? Or maybe "Diet Superhero"? :P
Posted by Alice on Aug 1, 2008 five to nine am
Posted by ominousorb on Jul 29, 2008 half past eleven pm
CURSE YOU FOR REFUSING TO SUBMIT, RON GILBERT!!!
Looking forward to DeathSpank btw :-D
... but seriously, I guess The Dark Knight just isn't your thing -- won't stop me from loving it
and yeah, really looking forward to that DeathSpank there ... I'm really antsy to just see how it's gonna look!
Posted by Roboto on Jul 30, 2008 five past midnight
Posted by GORBA on Jul 30, 2008 quarter past midnight
ts ts ts ts...
If you didn't had fun watching Dark Knight you were obviously not wanting to let the movie be fun. You were probably sitting in the cinema grumpying around and bitching about every silly detail....
Sure the movie is full of incosistencies and doesn't feel much like a comic book. But it sure is fun, and feels batman.
Posted by newt on Jul 30, 2008 ten to one am
Posted by ninomojo on Jul 30, 2008 quarter past three am
Posted by Ninomojo on Jul 30, 2008 ten past three am
I love you. Very much. I do. So why do you do this to me ??
Posted by Guy on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to five am
Posted by Brush on Jul 30, 2008 twenty five to seven am
Posted by Gorba on Jul 30, 2008 five to eleven am
Posted by JSW on Jul 30, 2008 quarter to eleven pm
Posted by Nollie on Jul 5, 2011 ten am
Posted by Baman on Jul 30, 2008 ten to five am
For all superhero haters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1YJbCftjBI
Posted by dflock on Jul 30, 2008 five to five am
Posted by Chalito on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to six am
But while I admit I haven't seen Unbreakable (so I won't comment on it), I can't stand most movies from Night Shyamalan.. I liked 6th sense, but then the village and signs were utter garbage.
I mean, geez, "Signs".. WTF? little grey men that come traveling all across the universe to take over the planet, and don't realize before getting out of their flying saucers that the planet is made in 80% of the substance they have a deadly allergy to??? and they can't even wear a RAINCOAT??? I mean, you could just kill those things by spitting at them!!
yeah, I felt kinda insulted by that piece of trash.. but The Dark Knight was fun, I especially enjoyed the Joker, very nice interpretation.
Posted by FBiarriz on Jul 30, 2008 six am
Posted by Elaine Marley on Jul 30, 2008 twenty five past two pm
SIGNS is a delicate ode (!) to books like The War of the Worlds, when a very simple thing can destroy the "superior" life forms. That idea it's also present in the new movie of Shyamalan (The Happening), and it's been taken in greats movies like The Body Snatchers.
Unbreakable it's the best movie of superheroes that a person who hate yankicomics can take. ��But Batman of C. Nolan is the second!! Both films have realistic and logical screenplays.
So... maybe Ron saw the George Clooney's film, I don't know what happened to him... but he's a little wrong... but, Indy 4 it's awesome!! Sure, cof-- :P
Posted by Chalito on Jul 31, 2008 twenty five past nine am
Ok you just lost all credibility :)
And btw, keep criticizing me for using Linux. But don't come later asking me to master a cyberpunk or call of cthulhu adventure for you (just to show you're as nerd as I am.. only that =I= don't have a problem with it :))
Posted by Bizarro on Jul 30, 2008 ten past six am
Posted by Alex on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to seven am
Posted by anon coward on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to seven am
biased opinion sounds biased.
anyhows, cant wait for deathspank
Posted by jinger bread on Jul 30, 2008 eleven am
Posted by theparticleman on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to seven am
Posted by blombo on Jul 30, 2008 seven am
Posted by Chris on Jul 30, 2008 five past seven am
But I haven't seen the new Batman movie, and am prepared to believe that this is also hyaena offal, or the offal of some similar animal. :)
Best superhero movie ever... erm... ah... oohh... s'a toughy... Maybe the new Watchman movie will be good... >:)
Posted by ndimucci on Jul 30, 2008 five to eight am
Sorry!
Posted by Ron Gilbert on Jul 30, 2008 half past three pm
Posted by JSW on Jul 30, 2008 five past eleven pm
Posted by john steinback on Jul 31, 2008 eight pm
Posted by blombo on Jul 31, 2008 twenty to five am
Posted by brett on Jul 30, 2008 twenty five to nine am
Posted by brett on Jul 30, 2008 twenty five to nine am
Posted by Bangbang on Jul 30, 2008 nine am
Posted by Barf on Jul 30, 2008 ten past nine am
Posted by Greg on Jul 30, 2008 ten to ten am
Posted by blombo on Jul 30, 2008 twenty past ten am
Posted by Seraphan on Jul 30, 2008 five past noon
Anyone that has read the Dune novels by Frank Herbert may have an idea why Ron deslikes heroes.
Posted by Batman on Jul 30, 2008 quarter past four pm
Posted by Matt on Jul 30, 2008 twenty to five pm
Posted by Sparrow on Jul 30, 2008 five to five pm
Posted by toothrot on Jul 31, 2008 quarter past two am
The recent Batman movie lacked sets with cool architecture so Gotham city was boring.
Posted by Turmoil23 on Jul 31, 2008 ten past six am
dark knigh was... ok, nothing more, i believe that the events surronding the movie made ppl see more than it was actually happening in the movie
-batman�s voice sucks a lot
-I think there was only one brief joker (trade mark) laugh, i belive that mark hamill has the best joker voice/acting (from the batman animated series)
-harvey dent was great, i wanted to see more of him as two face
-i like this bruce wayne, he is annoying, and you hate him everytime he is one the screen, thats how i always saw bruce
Posted by killuah on Jul 31, 2008 twenty to one pm
The Figure Batman himself was always the best "superhero" for me.
He is just one rich motherfucker who has this mental problems about bats and his parents.
The old Batman movies used to look in your face with this special "wink" in their left eye.
The new 2 are just...general movies.
Posted by Bravopunk on Jul 31, 2008 ten to one pm
So, am I a superhero ?
Is Batman really a superhero? Isn't he only a hero? I mean, he has no superpowers.
Who cares. I don't judge movies because of their genre.
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 7, 2008 ten past ten am
Well that's the hole point of Batman, isn't it? Show the world that normal people can also be superheroes if they only have unbelievable amounts of money to squander on it.
Posted by CordableTuna on Jul 31, 2008 ten to two pm
- The new Batman was indeed crap, especially the bit where Batman hacked everyone's cellphones and turned them into 3D sonars. However, the Joker made me moist in my special places.
- Also crap: The demo of On the Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness. It had grinding.
- Unbreakable: slightly crap. I liked Mr. Glass, though.
- I suggest you try to make Deathspank non-crap.
Crap.
Posted by Max on Jul 31, 2008 five past three pm
Posted by someguy on Jul 31, 2008 five past three pm
Posted by person a on Jul 31, 2008 twenty past eight pm
That said, if I wrote a blog that was widely read despite being seldom updated, I would probably devote a rare post to disparaging something popular in order to ostracize my simpleminded yet otherwise loving fans.
Posted by petekan on Aug 1, 2008 ten to two am
Posted by RandomGuy on Aug 1, 2008 quarter past nine am
Domain Name: DEATHSPANK.COM
Created on: 07-SEP-04
Expires on: 07-SEP-08
Last Updated on: 18-AUG-07
Could it be that Ron started DeathSpank in September 2004 already?
Interesting. Also, he's changed his mail account from gmail to another provider. Is google mail too sneaky, Ron?
Posted by Ron Gilbert on Aug 1, 2008 half past nine am
Posted by URL Fan on Aug 1, 2008 twenty five to seven pm
Posted by petekan on Aug 1, 2008 ten past eight pm
Posted by petekan on Aug 1, 2008 twenty past eight pm
I'll pay for that game... albeit it was the last thing I done.
Posted by naketep on Aug 1, 2008 quarter to ten pm
Posted by Cartman on Aug 1, 2008 ten to ten pm
Posted by someguy on Aug 2, 2008 ten am
Posted by Cartman on Aug 2, 2008 quarter to one pm
Posted by Terrence on Aug 3, 2008 three am
http://tvmedia.ign.com/tv/image/article/863/863565/southpark-1204Canada-on-Strike_1207080373.jpg
Posted by Retodon8 on Aug 2, 2008 twenty to five am
My memory of the trailer popped up again for some reason, and I never saw the thing itself.
I didn't even know if it ended up being any good, but now I'll definitely look it up.
Still need to see the new Batman too, but my expectations just lowered.
Oh well!
Posted by bodhisattva on Aug 2, 2008 ten past six am
Posted by Iwannabeaberliner on Aug 2, 2008 five to three pm
http://www.monkeyislandfestival.de/
(Yeah, it's a local rock festival)
If I knew how to use google maps, I'd put a marker to it. It's actually a small island.
Posted by someguy on Aug 2, 2008 ten past three pm
Posted by Someone on Aug 2, 2008 quarter to five pm
Posted by Abelo on Aug 2, 2008 ten to five pm
Posted by MarioColbert on Aug 4, 2008 quarter to noon
Posted by Cyrus on Aug 3, 2008 nine am
Posted by BigDog Beta on Aug 3, 2008 twenty to two pm
Posted by somguy on Aug 3, 2008 twenty past four pm
Posted by BostonDynamics people on Aug 3, 2008 twenty to nine pm
Posted by pananag on Aug 4, 2008 ten to six am
the original BigDog video
Posted by Iksbob on Aug 3, 2008 quarter past nine pm
Batman is a stylish film that cynical people won't like because they are conditioned to think most Hollywood films are a pile of crap (which is true), normal people will love it.
Unbreakable...reminds me of plastic soap that won't dissolve....no matter HOW many times you you run hot water on it.
Posted by Will Turner on Aug 3, 2008 twenty past eleven pm
Ron what were you thinking when you put that statement up there??
Posted by Greg on Aug 4, 2008 ten past one am
Posted by LuckyGuy on Aug 4, 2008 five past four am
It's not mine, it's not yours, it's from last year... but IT IS a winning lottery ticket.
I expect a reply now.
May I remind you: "Do not expect a reply in less your message involves a subpoena or winning lottery ticket."
Posted by AngryCanadian on Aug 5, 2008 twenty past four pm
Posted by Dante Kleinberg on Aug 4, 2008 five past ten am
I agree Unbreakable is a good movie, but it's no The Dark Knight (or even Iron Man, for that matter).
Posted by SmellyFarter on Aug 4, 2008 twenty past ten am
A recent study by scientists at MIT has concluded that The Dark Knight is a top-notch movie. So it's proven now. Debate is useless.
Posted by Elaine Marley on Aug 4, 2008 ten to noon
Batman maybe is the "worst" SUPERhero of all, remember he has not any superpowers, an he is not an alien, or a mutant. Maybe he's just a "hero", like DeathSpank (ok, ok!! don't trow me that, I'm a lady!! :P).
Posted by rado on Aug 4, 2008 five past eleven am
Posted by Guido on Aug 4, 2008 twenty past two pm
The only worthy live action super hero is the "The Tick" live action series.
;)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw_9QXBIYO4
Posted by Emailmeformore on Aug 5, 2008 five to seven pm
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 5, 2008 ten to eleven pm
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 6, 2008 quarter past three am
Posted by ChildishBuddha on Aug 6, 2008 twenty to six am
Posted by BadassNinja on Aug 6, 2008 ten past six am
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 6, 2008 twenty five past noon
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 6, 2008 twenty to one pm
Asking yourself is not the same as asking Ron Gilbert. I'm glad to point that out for you, I know it can be challenging for some people to differentiate between self and others. Escaped from the looney bin? You assuming you're buddha kind of strengthens that assumption. And buddhas don't get pissed off, that's their whole point, innit?
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 6, 2008 twenty past three pm
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 7, 2008 five past midnight
Posted by BadassNinja on Aug 7, 2008 twenty to one am
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 7, 2008 twenty five to one am
Posted by BadassNinja on Aug 7, 2008 ten to one am
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 7, 2008 quarter to two am
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 7, 2008 twenty five to noon
Posted by PlayingKarrde on Aug 7, 2008 twenty five to ten am
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 7, 2008 ten am
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 7, 2008 quarter past ten am
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 7, 2008 quarter to noon
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 7, 2008 half past noon
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 7, 2008 twenty to three pm
Posted by Pissed off Buddha on Aug 8, 2008 two am
It was nice arguing with you as well.
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 8, 2008 quarter past noon
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 8, 2008 quarter past noon
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 9, 2008 ten to one pm
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 9, 2008 half past one pm
verb [ trans. ] informal
strike hard and violently : bash a mosquito with a newspaper.
? ( bash something in) damage or break something by striking it violently : the car's rear window had been bashed in.
? [ intrans. ] ( bash into) collide with : the other vehicle bashed into the back of them.
? figurative criticize severely : a remark bashing the Belgian brewing industry.
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 11, 2008 quarter past seven pm
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 7, 2008 five past ten am
Posted by Johnny W on Aug 7, 2008 five past one pm
Posted by derula on Aug 7, 2008 quarter to five pm
I'm currently playing Day Of The Tentacle on my Wii. Hooray to ScummVM!
Posted by Yoshi on Aug 8, 2008 quarter to three pm
Unreakable is a masterpiece.
Posted by Dimitri on Aug 8, 2008 ten past six pm
I would never believe the day that I lose respect for you. And it's today!!
I understand that you don't like a superhero with mask and all but you must not deny the plot, cinematography, acting, etc... It's a great movie despite the Batman and all what this bring.
I love Unbreakable.
Posted by Ron Gilbert on Aug 8, 2008 quarter past six pm
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 9, 2008 ten to six am
Posted by Hannah on Aug 10, 2008 ten to eight am
Posted by Ijustwanttosaysomething on Aug 9, 2008 quarter to one am
Posted by Dimitri on Aug 9, 2008 quarter to eight am
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 9, 2008 twenty five to two pm
Posted by Superman is a dick on Aug 9, 2008 twenty five past nine pm
Posted by Henry on Aug 10, 2008 five to two am
Posted by xavi on Aug 10, 2008 ten to noon
Posted by Guido on Aug 10, 2008 ten to eleven pm
Posted by Sadyv on Aug 11, 2008 quarter past three am
Judging by his review of Dark Knight as a "pile of poo", I'd say Ron is.
Unbreakable was a poor film. The acting was quite poor. The role for Samuel Jackson in particular emphasized all the bad things about his acting. The script was simple, unoriginal fare. It was something that could have been taken (and judging by Shyamalan's other films and liberal "borrowing", likely was) from any number of late 80's/early 90's comics trying to portray heroes as grim and realistic. Like all Shayamalan's film, plot and internal logic inconsistencies become more grating on each subsequent viewing. The twist in Unbreakable is transparent, and anyone who has read a superhero story in their life (and give your moronic blanket dismissal of them all, Ron, I assume you have) can see coming from at least the half way point of the film.
Its hack work. Hack work glitzed up with some fake edginess, terribly old and cheap tension building devices, all designed to attract the popcorn munching masses looking for the "shocking" twist, and those who feel guilty about their low brow tastes, which films like Unbreakable they can point to in defense as being deep and cerebral without actually being so.
Posted by AskMeAboutLoom on Aug 11, 2008 five to four am
Posted by Alper on Aug 11, 2008 twenty five to three pm
It's all about personal taste, sth beyond good acting or cinematography etc. Even though I have studied film making in college yet I hate the movies of Stanley Kubrick, so what!
Posted by Itamar Schefi on Aug 11, 2008 twenty five past three pm
Batman is a GREAT movie, and you just don't need to deserve what is not deserved to be needed. It's all very simple.
Posted by J0e h3rb on Aug 12, 2008 ten past midnight
i thought heath ledger played really well, and it should've been called ''Joker: The Movie'' in my opinion.
also, isn't it the creators right to label their own creation? If Ron doesn't think Deathspank is a superhero, but a Rubber-clown-shoesniffer (just an example here), then he can do just that.
Posted by Bozo Bob on Aug 12, 2008 five past two am
Posted by Shadee on Aug 12, 2008 five past five am
The only god thing about Dark knight imo was Heath Ledger's version of the Joker. The guy who played Batman (I can't remember and cba to find out what his name is) annoyed the hell out of me throughout the movie. His poor attempts at throwing his voice whenever he was in costume, his Jim Carrey facial expressions...
So I'll leave you with this to make up for it:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=G4v1hAnfy1I
Posted by Shadee on Aug 12, 2008 five past five am
Posted by Karl on Aug 18, 2008 seven pm
Posted by AngryCanadian on Aug 12, 2008 twenty past one pm
Posted by Felix on Aug 13, 2008 one pm
The acting: Batman was awful. His stupid voice is just horrible. The Joker: I know I'm supposed to love the dead guy (And I love his other movies) but why was I watching a joker who never laughed? The Girl: HORRID. Two Face: Great! And the one redeeming thing about the movie.
The Cinematography: That director can't do an action scene to save his life. Its shaky cam galore. if you could figure out exactly what happened in the last action scene, let me know, cause I know the plot points but the action shots are just to shaky for logic. Compare to Batman the first where the action shots make sense.
The Plot: So I did like the fact that the Batman was totally outmatched by the Joker's layers upon layers of tricks. But that cell phone bit? Come on!
Unbreakable: I HATED Signs with a passion. Stupid religious propaganda movie. The worst rendition of War of the Worlds that I have ever seen. Never saw the Village (Sounded stupid to me), but really liked the Sixth Sense if only because the twist totally got me (They usually don't fool me - I was bored in The Usual Suspects).
So with those comments in mind, I thought Unbreakable was awesome. Even after knowing what the plot trick was, I very much enjoyed it.
Oh and just because I'm no schill, I sadly, did not enjoy Precipice of Darkness. A little too much grinding for my tastes.
Posted by Martin on Aug 13, 2008 ten to ten pm
I used to like Unbreakable. But Signs was so bad, what ever "genius" unbreakable posessed was the same that drove the creation of Signs; therefore, tainting Unbreakable forever... water wtf?!? So, was Bruce Willis an alien in Unbreakable?
Posted by Dora on Aug 14, 2008 twenty five to two am
Posted by Journeyman on Aug 14, 2008 twenty past eleven am
Posted by Captain Carnage on Aug 14, 2008 twenty five past one pm
Posted by murderous_tree on Aug 15, 2008 ten past ten am
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 15, 2008 five to noon
"I'm one of the few persons on the planet brave enough to admit democracy is a big pile of poo."
Posted by Ron on Aug 15, 2008 five past two pm
- democracy is a big pile of poo
- monarchy is hip again
- i should be the leader
- i dictate what's hot
- i like saying controversial things
Posted by Santiago on Aug 15, 2008 twenty five to one pm
I`m glad somone else realizes the obvious mistakes of the last Batman movie, not to mention the psychological twists the characters take which are quite unbelievable. The same goes for the Indiana Jones sequel (the last one is even a joke to any person who heard what archeaology is).
I must just add that I did enjoy other superhero films, like the first two Batman movies which have nothing to do with the following sequel.
Other movies like Superman or Spiderman really stink, not to mention that they don�t carry the original superheroe�s spirit they caracterize.
Posted by King Louis XIV on Aug 15, 2008 ten past two pm
Posted by Ives Castagnino on Aug 15, 2008 twenty to five pm
Posted by Karl on Aug 16, 2008 twenty five to noon
If you hate superheroes, you should have no reason to like the Dark Knight. Haven't seen Unbreakable, but one of the defining characteristics about it seems to be how un-superheroic it is.
At any rate, I'm sure Deathspank will not be very similar to Batman. Could Ron have said so in a less grumpy way? That answers that.
Posted by Leave Batman alone!! on Aug 16, 2008 ten past noon
Posted by StupidIdiot on Aug 17, 2008 seven am
Posted by Dissapointed on Aug 18, 2008 five past seven am
Unbreakable - abysmal. But still better than Indy 4.
Dark Knight - not excellent, but still very, very good.
I cannot understand how a person who created a timeless classic like Monkey Island could actually have such an incredibly bad taste in movies. I'm unbelievably dissapointed.
Posted by Ron Gilbert on Aug 18, 2008 ten past eight am
Posted by Dissapointed on Aug 18, 2008 quarter past eleven am
Many of us come here to read your blog because we appreciate the design philosophy you established in your adventure games. Unfortunately, your choice of movie favourites made me feel like your philosophy somehow changed, that it possibly became addapted to new industry conditions. It reminded me of the George Lucas downfall: the author of original Star Wars now seems to have lost every trace of his talent - just take a look at the latest Star Wars sequels and Indy 4.
That being said, I did like the idea in Unbreakable, but I think the movie was extremely poorly executed. I too generally dislike superheroes, and that is why I was so captivated by the new Batman movie: the bad guy in this movie is absolutely brilliant. I would as well suggets that you try watching Dark Knight again, trying to think of it as "The Joker" movie, but I know people's oppinions do not change easily.
One thing that really surprised me is that you liked Indy 4, while you (understendably!) found Pirates: At Worlds End to be one of the biggest dissapointments.
I found those two movies incredibly similar!
Posted by Elaine Marley on Aug 18, 2008 twenty to seven pm
And George L****s??! Please.
Posted by lolwut on Aug 19, 2008 five to five am
Posted by Sparrow on Aug 19, 2008 quarter to two am
Posted by Scorbutman on Aug 19, 2008 twenty five to eight am
au revoir !
Posted by Herman (no, is not for the MI character, thats my name) on Aug 19, 2008 five to ten am
Im agree with you,
Batman: Bad
Unbreakable:good.
but, im really here to say my opinion about something. I know im only a Uruguayan kid, and probably you wont read this, and Im shure you dont have any idea where in the world is Uruguay.
Well, the thing is that I think you must do quick as posible a Monkey Island game. look, you maybe will be hit by a car the day of tomorrow, or maybe a psycho-killer will kill you in the next week (maybe it will happens to me, I dont know, jaj) and, if that happens, the entire world, never, never, will understand how monkey island ends, what happens in the MI2 finale, and what is the damn Secret.
Im not saying you must do it with lucas arts... what a fuck, if you want to do it in power point do it, or in the macromedia flash. but just do it.
Think if a Uruguayan kid, loves monkey island, you have to realize that your creation is really something big.
Posted by Interstate78 on Aug 19, 2008 ten to three pm
You say Batman is a pile of poo.
I'm all for a good ole argument, but only when there's actual <i>argumentation</i> along with it. So please, tell me
Why is it a pile of poo?
Posted by Interstate78 on Aug 19, 2008 five to three pm
Posted by Goncalo on Aug 19, 2008 ten past four pm
Posted by eurofragger(Ger)[DE] on Aug 19, 2008 quarter past eight pm
Unbreakable. I'll be looking out for that one. Though your taste for movies can at times be slightly biased, usually you're not wrong when you actually praise one!
re to Interstate78:
I'll give you some arguments.
It is a pile of poo because it is:
. A pile of dung
. A pile of feces
. A pile of scat
. A pile of muck
. A pile of excrement
. A pile of shit
. A pile of turds
. A pile of what-you-left-behind-in-your-underwear-last-time-you-stood-in-a-queue
Though to me it seems that at this moment I've clearly made my point, you will probably still want more and more arguments. Now, I don't know Ron personally, but from a certain point of view I would assume he means poorly constructed or plainly boring storyline, poor dialogue and a wasted budget on overdone graphics. I hope that's enough for you.
re to Goncalo:
Wall-E is great, amazing graphics! Pixar animation studio are some of the best 3D guru's out there and they've proven it. At times I couldn't even make out whether landscapes, effects and models were the real deal or pre-rendered 3d graphics!
Slightly off-topic:
Ron, some guy on this gamers' website wrote a blog and made a reference to a Monkey Island 2 quote - just thought it was funny - check it on http://clanbase.ggl.com/blog.php?blog=1204 !
Posted by Karl on Aug 20, 2008 quarter to eleven am
This is my idea for a superhero game. You don't play the heroic moments, you play the alter-ego, who, through dialogue, manipulation, etc., has to maintain your alter-ego. Let's say you're at a birthday party and you get the Hero Signal. You got to MacGuyver your way out of the birthday party, so you can save the day. (Other locales include work, dates, school, church, theatres, etc.) And if you fail, you see the villains kill your loved ones. You would have different characters, the millionaire, the news person, the millitary guy, the alien in disguise. As I imagine it, it could even use the SCUMM engine, because it would primarily be dialogue and puzzles. But I'm not a programmer/game designer, so what do I know.
Sorry if this is kinda hijacky. I tend to just follow my thoughts down rabbit holes.
Posted by Publisher on Aug 21, 2008 five to three am
Posted by Publisher on Aug 21, 2008 ten to four am
Posted by Karl on Aug 21, 2008 twenty five past three pm
Oh wait, you were making a joke. I feel kinda silly.
Posted by Alex on Aug 22, 2008 twenty five to two am
Posted by Henry on Aug 23, 2008 half past two am
Posted by Peter Lord on Aug 26, 2008 quarter to two pm
Posted by Bashar on Aug 27, 2008 five past three am
I think they got sympathy for the passed away Joker. I am yet to see it though. Not a batman fan, but thought it would be good
Posted by Guido on Aug 28, 2008 five past three pm
Posted by jack Shandy on Sep 26, 2008 twenty five past two pm
The Dark Knight is the best Movie i've ever seen.Monkey Island ruled my whole life,i missed my first girlfriend for it,but now...dark knight changed things....forever.
Posted by Jack Shandy on Sep 26, 2008 twenty five past two pm
Posted by Someone on Sep 26, 2008 half past two pm
Posted by Durang0 on Oct 24, 2008 twenty five to ten am
Dark Knight was made with the hollywood formula, there is basicly nothing that seperates it from the masses of other superhero movies. At the end of the day, a man dressed as a bat beats the crap out of hordes of bad guys. Then there is the joker who is supposedly an intriguing character with "deep" thoughts and ideology. But really, how is he different from any superhero movie villain? Except that he utters random aphorisms about chaos and at the end of the movie puts lots of innocent people to a gunpoint test of moral .. which sounded alot like something you would find in a highschool ethic study book. But apparently these things make everyone think the movie is clever and that it "has a good plot".
And why does it have to be 2h 40min long? Enermous amount of silly side characters is what I think is the reason. For example, do we absolutely need to see Morgan Freemans character so much? Basicly the only thing he does is trying to explain why batmans fancy toys work.
Then there's Gary Oldmans character and his family, with the blue eyed innocent kid brought in just to be a victim for the nro 2 bad guy. These are just stereotypical devices to advance the meaningless plot. Nobody cares about the drama in these kind of movies because there is no time to build any of the characters. Basicly these scenes just try to justify the inevitable asskicking between the superhero and the villain and his gang of loyal sidekicks.
Another thing that contributed to the 2h 40min waste of time was the way they had to advance the plot with a massive amount of unoriginal events, enough to fill up two movies: blowing up a hospital, car chase nro 143, blowing up ferries, blowing up [name here], capturing chinese bad guy (villain nro 4 or something), and the list goes on. The movie has so many climaxes that I wonder how anyone is able to get excited about any of them.
I'm afraid they will do alot more of these movies. Because they make money. Really the only thing I wonder, what will people expect to see in the future that would be so ultra cool? When will people grow tired of the same old formula? There is so much more to movies than what the flashy blockbuster stuff offers.
Posted by PeteSahat on Oct 24, 2008 twenty past four pm
Maybe the Dark Night uses a little of the Hollywood formula, but I'm glad they got rid of that neon-stlyled city, "funny" Schwarzenegger-villains in stupid dresses and Joel Schumacher who couldn't catch up with Tim Burton. Yeah, Jack Nickolson would have been cooler but quite possibly he hadn't survived the stunts until the movie was done.
Posted by Durang0 on Oct 24, 2008 ten to midnight
"Best movie ever"? I guess this year it was for some. Nr. 3 on imdb? Not that the list ever had any credibility but still.
Judging from the outrage and astonishment in this board, you'd think Ron just confessed being a child molester.
Posted by Yamaha Fairings on Dec 14, 2008 twenty five to two pm
Posted by Mexican Breakfast Food on Mar 16, 2009 twenty five past seven am
Posted by Yes on Apr 14, 2009 ten past eleven am
Posted by Martyn Cooke on Sep 7, 2009 ten past five pm
The "super-villain" in the movie is actually just some poor sap who's really into comic books, and theorizes that if he is so fragile, there must be someone out there who is nigh-invunerable - just like in the comic books he reads.
There's a human element throughout the whole film that regular superhero movies only touch upon (best example I can think of is Spiderman).
Though I think Ron is wrong on one thing - Batman isn't a superhero, unless you count super rich as being a power. If so I eagerly await the Scrooge McDuck movie coming soonerish.
Posted by Compro Oro on Mar 13, 2010 half past six am
Posted by Dreadjaws on Mar 18, 2011 quarter to nine am
You thought Indy 4 was awesome and TDK was crap? I honestly was about to buy Deathspank but I didn't because now I'm worried you're not the same person who did Monkey Island. You already dissapointed me with this, I don't want to be dissapointed again.
I really thought you were great, but it looks to me like you're one of those persons who go determined to love or hate a movie and they do as expected, regardless of how the movie turned out. I was determined to hate TDK, but I loved it. The opposite happened to me with Indy 4. And no, I'm not a person who ends up always with the opposite opinion.
All I would like is to know the reasons you didn't like it (I don't believe you're one of those people who hate something only because everyone loves it).